What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.