If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
https://corbett-allred.technetbloggers.de/very-best-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower-system-1682545259 of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is safe distance from cell tower that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.